PLM SystemsDrevise reads models, drawings and revision state out of Teamcenter and writes review status and feature-level findings back onto the item.
PLM SystemsCAD and drawing revisions come out of Windchill; review results and the manufacturing impact of a change go back onto the part.
PLM Systems3DEXPERIENCE and CATIA data feed the feature list Drevise reasons about, including release state and change history.
PLM SystemsVault and Fusion supply geometry and drawings; findings are written back to the revision record of the file they belong to.
ERP SystemsPart master, BOM, routings and supplier records are read from SAP; qualification criteria, inspection requirements and approval status are written back.
ERP SystemsCommercial and planning records from Infor meet the technical assessment on the same part number, without a separate tool.
ERP SystemsPrices, order status and supplier history are pulled from proALPHA and enriched with the technical judgment on the part.
ERP SystemsProduction and order data from Gewatec give every part under review its planning and cost context.
ERP SystemsGeovision records feed the part master and supplier view Drevise works from, and results flow back into the same records.
ERP SystemsPart master and order data from Vectotax are read; approval status and inspection requirements are written back.
ERP SystemsProdat supplies the planning and commercial records behind the parts in review, so decisions carry their business context.
CAQ SystemsInspection equipment and gauge data from the Hoffmann Group inform which measurement method is realistic for a characteristic.
CAQ SystemsInspection plans, characteristics and FAI results are read; Drevise proposes plans derived from the risk of each feature.
CAQ SystemsPickert-based inspection data meets the tolerated features it belongs to, so evidence and requirement stay connected.
CAQ SystemsMeasurement results and inspection evidence from Dr. Eilebrecht SSE close the loop back to the drawing they prove.
CAQ SystemsInspection records from Qualitainer are matched to the characteristics they prove, batch after batch.
No integration matches that search. Tell us the system and we will look at it.